PENERAPAN MODEL THINK-PAIR-SHARE BERBANTUAN LEMBAR KERJA PESERTA DIDIK TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS X MA PROYEK UNIVA MEDAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v6i1.9267Keywords:
Think-Pair-Share, LKPD, learning outcomes, math learning, opportunity materialAbstract
The main problem in this study is that the mathematics learning outcomes of students, especially in the X-3 class of Private MA UNIVA Medan, are still low. This study aims to improve students' mathematics learning outcomes using the Think-Pair-Share (TPS) learning model assisted by Student Worksheets (LKPD) for students in grades X-3 of Private MA UNIVA Medan. The research uses a type of class action research (Class Acion Research) which consists of two cycles where each cycle is carried out 4 meetings with a sample of 30 students. The instruments used included learning outcome tests, observation sheets, and student response questionnaires. The data analysis technique uses quantitative and qualitative analysis.
The results achieved in this study are: (1) in the first cycle, the average score of learning outcomes of students in class X-3 of the Private MA Medan Project was 71.46 while in the second cycle, the average score of learning outcomes was obtained which was higher, namely 80. Students' mathematics learning completeness has also increased. In the first cycle, as many as 14 (47%) students achieved learning completion, while in the second cycle as many as 29 (97%) students achieved learning completeness and classical completeness was achieved, (2) there was an increase in student learning activities in each cycle. This means that the completeness of learning in cycle II was achieved classically because the number of students who completed reached more than 80%. Based on the results of the research mentioned above, it can be concluded that the results of mathematics learning through the Think-Pair-Share type cooperative model of students in class X-3 of the Private MA Univa Project have increased.
References
Auer, A., J. Von Below, L. Nahuelhual, M. Mastrangelo, A. Gonzalez, M. Gluch, M. Vallejos, L. Staiano, P. Laterra, and J. Paruelo. “The Role of Social Capital and Collective Actions in Natural Capital Conservation and Management.” Environmental Science & Policy 107 (May 2020): 168–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.024.
Barrios, Andres, Rodrigo Taborda, and Ximena Rueda. “Time Poverty: An Unintended Consequence of Women Participation in Farmers’ Associations.” Social Indicators Research 178, no. 1 (May 1, 2025): 225–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-025-03571-4.
Chaffey, C., & Ellis-Chadwick, F. “Digital Marketing (8th Ed.).” Pearson, 2022.
Creswell, John W. Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Edited by Thousand Oaks. London: SAGE Publications, 2020.
Dwijanto Witjaksono, Andre, Dewie Tri Wijayati Wardoyo, Khoirur Rozaq, Dwiarko Nugrohoseno, Budiono Budiono, and Trias Madanika Kusumaningum. “Peningkatan Kemampuan Manajerial UMKM Sari Kedelai Di Sumberrejo Kabupaten Pasuruan.” Abimanyu: Journal of Community Engagement 4, no. 1 (February 28, 2023): 33–38. https://doi.org/10.26740/abi.v4n1.p33-38.
Ibrahim, B., & Aljarah, A. “The Era of Instagram Expansion: Matching Social Media Marketing Activities and Brand Loyalty through Customer Relationship Quality.” Journal of Marketing Communications, 2023, 29(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2021.
Kammer-Kerwick, Matt, Kara Takasaki, J. Bruce Kellison, and Jeff Sternberg. “Asset-Based, Sustainable Local Economic Development: Using Community Participation to Improve Quality of Life Across Rural, Small-Town, and Urban Communities.” Applied Research in Quality of Life 17, no. 5 (October 22, 2022): 3023–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-022-10051-1.
Khan, Seema A., Fengmin Zhao, Lori J. Goldstein, David Cella, Mark Basik, Mehra Golshan, Thomas B. Julian, et al. “Early Local Therapy for the Primary Site in De Novo Stage IV Breast Cancer: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial (E2108).” Journal of Clinical Oncology 40, no. 9 (March 20, 2022): 978–87. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02006.
Kotler, P., Keller, K. L., & Chernev, A. “Marketing Management.” Pearson, 2022.
Kotler, P, H Kartajaya, and I Setiawan. “Marketing 5.0: Technology for Humanity.” Wiley, 2021.
Lim, Weng Marc, and Tareq Rasul. “Customer Engagement and Social Media: Revisiting the Past to Inform the Future.” Journal of Business Research 148 (September 2022): 325–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.068.
Muzakir, Idris, H. W Adda, Darman, P. C. D Buntuang, and A. A Haq. “Sosialisasi Peran Kelompok Sadar Wisata (Pokdarwis) Dalam Pengembangan Pariwisata Untuk Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Desa Towale Kabupaten Donggala.” Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2023, 4(4), 7838– 7843.
Seim, Josh. “Participant Observation, Observant Participation, and Hybrid Ethnography.” Sociological Methods & Research 53, no. 1 (February 10, 2024): 121–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124120986209.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. “Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach (7th Ed.).” John Wiley & Sons, 2020.
Wood, L. “Participatory Action Learning and Action Research: Theory, Practice and Process.” Routledge, 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anggi Rizki Ananda Putri Lubis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
