Developing an Accreditation Intelligence Dashboard as a Decision Support System for Continuous KARS Compliance in Hospitals

Authors

  • Diah Karlina Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Mitra Sejati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v6i1.8496

Keywords:

Hospital accreditation, Decision support system, Health information systems, Quality governance, KARS, Universal Health Coverage

Abstract

Background:
Hospital accreditation is a key mechanism for ensuring quality and patient safety, yet in many hospitals accreditation compliance remains episodic and weakly embedded in routine governance. In Indonesia, compliance with the Hospital Accreditation Commission (KARS) standards is often managed retrospectively, limiting the role of accreditation as a continuous quality improvement instrument. Digital decision-support approaches are therefore needed to strengthen continuous accreditation governance.

Methods:
This study employed a mixed-methods design with a design science research approach in a private general hospital in Indonesia. Data were collected through document analysis of KARS standards and hospital performance reports, semi-structured interviews with hospital managers and accreditation team members, and non-participant observation of accreditation-related workflows. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically, while accreditation indicators were systematically mapped to existing hospital information systems to inform the development of an Accreditation Intelligence Dashboard.

Results:
The findings indicate that although accreditation-related data are widely available, they are fragmented across multiple systems and primarily used for survey preparation rather than continuous monitoring. The proposed Accreditation Intelligence Dashboard integrates key KARS indicators with operational hospital data using a business intelligence framework. This integration enables real-time visualization, trend analysis, and managerial decision support, enhancing situational awareness and internal accountability. The effectiveness of the dashboard is influenced by leadership engagement and organizational readiness for data-driven management.

Conclusion:
The study demonstrates that an Accreditation Intelligence Dashboard can support continuous KARS compliance by transforming fragmented accreditation data into actionable managerial intelligence. This approach strengthens hospital quality governance and has potential to support the quality objectives of Universal Health Coverage.

References

Hysong, S. J., Yang, C., Wong, J., & Knox, M. K. (2023). Beyond information design: Designing health care dashboards for evidence-driven decision-making. Applied Clinical Informatics, 14(2), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2068-6699

Schall, M. C., Cullen, L., & Pennathur, P. (2017). Usability evaluation and implementation of a health information technology dashboard of evidence-based quality indicators. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 35(6), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000337

Greenfield, D., & Braithwaite, J. (2008). Health sector accreditation research: A systematic review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 20(3), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzn005

Shaw, C. D., Braithwaite, J., Moldovan, M., Nicklin, W., Grgic, I., Fortune, T., & Whittaker, S. (2014). External quality mechanisms for healthcare: Accreditation, certification, or inspection? International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 26(Suppl 1), i11–i19. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzu017

De Pourcq, K., Gemmel, P., & Trybou, J. (2016). Measuring performance in hospitals: The development of an operational dashboard to coordinate and optimize patient, material and information flows. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 31(2), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2297

Kihuba, E., Gathara, D., Mwinga, S., Mulaku, M., Kosgei, R., & English, M. (2014). Assessing the ability of health information systems in hospitals to support evidence-informed decisions. Global Health Action, 7, 24859. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v7.24859

Cresswell, K. M., & Sheikh, A. (2013). Organizational issues in the implementation of health information technology. BMJ Quality & Safety, 22(8), 668–674. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001529

Bail, K., Grealish, L., & Draper, B. (2020). A digital alert feedback system to enhance quality and accreditation readiness. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(21–22), 4103–4114. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15475

Kunjan, K., Doebbeling, B. N., & Toscos, T. (2019). Dashboards to support operational decision making in health centers: A case for role-specific design. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(17), 1585–1596. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1488418

Ovretveit, J., Gustafson, D., Huang, C., & Bate, P. (2017). Quality collaboratives: Lessons from research. BMJ Quality & Safety, 26(6), 447–455. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006317

Arah, O. A., Westert, G. P., Hurst, J., & Klazinga, N. S. (2006). A conceptual framework for the OECD Health Care Quality Indicators Project. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 18(3), 181–187. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzl024

Flodgren, G., Pomey, M. P., Taber, S. A., & Eccles, M. P. (2011). Effectiveness of external inspection of compliance with standards in improving healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2011(11), CD008992. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008992.pub2

Downloads

Published

21-02-2026

How to Cite

Karlina, D. (2026). Developing an Accreditation Intelligence Dashboard as a Decision Support System for Continuous KARS Compliance in Hospitals. Journal of Innovative and Creativity (Joecy), 6(1), 12970–12977. https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v6i1.8496

Issue

Section

Articles