Aturan Yang Digunakan Masyarakat Adat Untuk Pelestarian Lingkungan

Authors

  • Sri Handayani Universitas Islam Raden Rahmat Malang
  • Alimas Jonsa Universitas Teuku Umar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v5i2.771

Keywords:

Masyarakat Adat Tengger, lingkungan, rules in used, Institutional Analysis and Development

Abstract

Indigenous peoples often live and survive in a natural environment that holds a variety of exotic wealth, both in terms of natural and human resources and customs as their culture. Indigenous peoples are often at the forefront of defending natural resources because that is where they live. However, indigenous peoples are also affected by external damage such as pollution and their natural conditions are resistant to natural disasters. The purpose of this research is to analyze the rules in use of the Tengger indigenous people in Pandansari Village, Poncokusumo Subdistrict, Malang Regency to preserve their environment. Rules in use is a parameter found in Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) which is commonly used to analyze neo-institutionalism public policies, especially Rational Choice Institutionalism (RCI). This research was conducted in mid-2023. This research uses qualitative methods with data collection techniques through interviews and documentation. Furthermore, the results of the interview were analyzed with a coding process using N-Vivo 12 Plus.  The results of this study indicate that the Tengger indigenous people in Pandansari village, Poncokusumo sub-district, Malang Regency implement rules that naturally arise from the ideas and ideas of the community itself by gathering in a disaster response community. Where the community is engaged in self-help groups based on collective awareness, namely concern, then the government at the regional and village levels provides a legal umbrella for the community.

References

Bocking, S. (2023). Indigenous Knowledge and Perspectives. 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92679-3_20-1

Chua, M. H., & Yau, Y. (2022). Institutional Analysis and Development ( IAD ) Approach for Determining the Effects of the Waste Charging Scheme on Household Food Waste Recycling.

Fernández‐Llamazares, A. (2019). Integr Envir Assess Manag - 2019 - Fernández‐Llamazares - A State‐of‐the‐Art Review of Indigenous Peoples and.pdf. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management — Volume 16, Number 3—pp. 324–341. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4239

Madigele, P. K. (2018). Efficiency of common-pool resource institutions: focusing on water users associations in South Africa. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20(2), 825–840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-9912-1

Nurcahyo, O. H., & Astutik, D. (2018). Harmonisasi masyarakat adat Suku Tengger harmonisasi masyarakat adat Suku Tengger (analisis keberadaan modal sosial pada proses harmonisasi pada masayarakat adat Suku Tengger, Desa Tosari, Pasuruan, Jawa Timur). Jurnal Sosiologi, 2(1), 1–12.

Rahail, E. B., Kalalo, J. J. J., Betaubun, H. F., & Kalalo, C. N. (2018). Environmental Law Politics and Malind Anim Indigenous People Rights Protection based on Free and Prior Informed Consent Principles. E3S Web of Conferences, 73(32), 0–4. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187302017

Richardson, B. J. (2009). The Ties that Bind: Indigenous Peoples and Environmental Governance. Indigenous Peoples and the Law, 26. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509955565.ch-013

Staroňová, K., & Gajduschek, G. (2019). Guy Peters – Institutional Theory in Political Science: The New Institutionalism. Perspectives from Central and Eastern Europe. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 12(2), 281–285. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2019-0024

Weyland, K. (2002). Limitations of rational-choice institutionalism for the study of Latin American politics. Studies in Comparative International Development, 37(1), 57–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686338

Downloads

Published

04-06-2025

How to Cite

Handayani, S., & Jonsa, A. (2025). Aturan Yang Digunakan Masyarakat Adat Untuk Pelestarian Lingkungan . Journal of Innovative and Creativity, 5(2), 5232–5237. https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v5i2.771

Issue

Section

Articles