Relevansi Program Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) di Indonesia dengan Prinsip Maqashid Syariah: Hifz al-Nafs

Authors

  • Ahmad Muhyidin STIS Abu Zairi Bondowoso
  • Muhammad Syarofi Universitas Pembangunan Nasional “Veteran” Jawa Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v6i1.7506

Keywords:

Free Nutritious Meal Program, Maqashid Shariah, Hifz al-Nafs

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the relevance of Indonesia’s Free Nutritious Meal Program (Makan Bergizi Gratis/MBG) to the framework of Maqashid Shariah, with a particular focus on the principle of Hifz al-Nafs (protection of life). As a strategic national policy regulated through the Decree of the Head of the National Nutrition Agency No. 63 of 2025, MBG is designed to address malnutrition and improve human resource quality. This research seeks to examine whether the program substantively aligns with Islamic ethical objectives centered on human welfare and life preservation. This study employs a qualitative normative approach using a maqashid-based policy analysis. Data were collected through a systematic review of policy documents, including technical guidelines of MBG, official government reports, and relevant academic literature on Maqashid Shariah and public health policy. The analytical framework is grounded in classical and contemporary Maqashid Shariah theory, emphasizing Hifz al-Nafs as a primary objective (daruriyyat). Data were analyzed inductively through thematic coding to identify policy components that reflect life protection and health security. The findings indicate that MBG demonstrates strong alignment with Hifz al-Nafs through strict hygiene standards, targeted nutrition for vulnerable groups, quality control mechanisms, and balanced nutrient provision based on recommended dietary allowances. The program also indirectly supports Hifz al-‘Aql and Hifz al-Nasl by enhancing cognitive development and safeguarding future generations. However, challenges remain regarding implementation consistency and regional capacity. The study concludes that MBG is substantively relevant to Maqashid Shariah, particularly Hifz al-Nafs, positioning the program as both a public health intervention and an ethical instrument for societal welfare. Integrating Maqashid Shariah into policy evaluation provides a normative foundation for strengthening equitable and sustainable nutrition policies.

References

Agustini, U. (2025). Efektivitas dan tantangan kebijakan Program Makan Bergizi Gratis di Indonesia. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Pembangunan Daerah, 8(1), 45–60.

Al-Mursi, A. (2010). Maqasid Syariah. Amzah.

Al-Qaradawi, Y. (2003). Membumikan Syariat Islam: Keluwesan Aturan Ilahi untuk Manusia. Pustaka Mizan.

Al-Shatibi, A. I. (2003). Al-Muwafaqat fi Usul al-Shariah. Dar Ibn Affan.

Alvarez, M. E., Savouré, A., & Szabados, L. (2022). Proline metabolism as regulatory hub. Trends in Plant Science, 27(1), 39–55.

Andini, S. T. (2025). A policy implementation review of the Free Nutritious Meal Program (MBG). Jurnal Implementasi Kebijakan Publik, 1–20.

Auda, J. (2015). Maqasid al-shariah as philosophy of Islamic law: A systems approach. International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Bakri, A. J. (1996). Konsep Maqashid Syariah Menurut As-Syatibi. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Chapra, M. U. (2008). The Islamic vision of development in the light of maqasid al-shariah. Islamic Research and Training Institute.

Fansuri, H. (2025). Juridical Analysis of Halal Certification as a Legal Obligation for MSMEs from the Perspective of Law No. 33 of 2014 and Maqashid Sharia: Juridical Analysis of Halal Certification as a Legal Obligation for MSMEs from the Perspective of Law No. 33 of 2014 . INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL, POLICY AND LAW, 6(3), 39–47.

Hallaq, W. B. (2010). Sejarah Teori Hukum Islam: Pengantar Usul Fiqih Mazhab Sunni. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Indonesia, S. N. R. (2025). Program Makan Bergizi Gratis sentuh 20 juta penerima, ciptakan 290 ribu lapangan kerja. Setneg News.

Kemenkeu. (2025). Pemerintah Salurkan Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG), Ini Sasaran Utama Penerimanya. Media Keuangan Kemenkeu. https://mediakeuangan.kemenkeu.go.id/article/show/pemerintah-salurkan-makan-bergizi-gratis-mbg-ini-sasaran-utama-penerimanya

Qomarrullah, R. (2025). Dampak jangka panjang Program MBG dalam menurunkan stunting dan malnutrisi. Jurnal Intelek Madani, 3(2), 101–120.

Rahmat, P. S. (2021). Penelitian kualitatif. Equilibrium: Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(9), 1–8.

RI, K. K. (2025). Kemenkes Tegaskan Keamanan Pangan sebagai Kunci Keberhasilan Program Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG). https://kemkes.go.id/id/kemenkes-tegaskan-keamanan-pangan-sebagai-kunci-keberhasilan-program-makan-bergizi-gratis

Setiyowati, A. (2022). Analisis tematik dalam penelitian kualitatif kebijakan publik. Jurnal Metodologi Penelitian Sosial, 4(2), 55–68.

Statistik, B. P. (2025). Program Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) di Indonesia: Latar Belakang dan Implementasi Kebijakan. Survei Khusus Program Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG). https://sampangkab.bps.go.id/id/news/2025/11/05/184/-survei-khusus-program-makan-bergizi-gratis--mbg-

Suprapto, F. A. (2025). Policy implementation review of the Free Nutritious Meal Program in Indonesia. JISDEP Policy Review, 2(1), 1–30.

Syah, I. M. (1992). Filsafat Hukum Islam. Bumi Aksara.

Syarifuddin, A. (2003). Garis-Garis Besar Fiqih. Kencana.

Tubarad, M., Hasan, A., & Rahman, F. (2022). Maqasid al-shariah as a framework for public policy evaluation. Journal of Islamic Ethics, 6(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1163/24685542-12340045

Waluyo, S. D. (2025). Kebijakan Makan Bergizi Gratis: Tinjauan ekonomi politik dan redistribusi sumber daya. Dinamika Kebijakan, 5(3), 200–215.

Yunia, I., & Kadir, A. (2015). Prinsip Dasar Ekonomi Islam Perspektif Maqasid Syariah. Prenadamedia Group.

Zaluchu, S. E. (2020). Strategi penelitian kualitatif dan implikasinya dalam ilmu sosial. Evangelikal: Jurnal Teologi Injili Dan Pembinaan Warga Jemaat, 4(1), 28–38.

Downloads

Published

25-01-2026

How to Cite

Muhyidin, A., & Syarofi, M. (2026). Relevansi Program Makan Bergizi Gratis (MBG) di Indonesia dengan Prinsip Maqashid Syariah: Hifz al-Nafs. Journal of Innovative and Creativity, 6(1), 5214–5220. https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v6i1.7506

Issue

Section

Articles