Meningkatkan Berfikir Kritis Menggunakan Kombinasi Model PBL, PP, TPS di SDN Kabupaten Kotabaru

Authors

  • Dwi Kartika Rahmawati Edi Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
  • Chresty Anggreani Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v6i1.7420

Keywords:

Critical Thinking Skills, Problem Based Learning, Probing Promting, Think Pair and Share

Abstract

This study was conducted to improve students’ critical thinking skills through the implementation of a combined learning model consisting of Problem-Based Learning (PBL), Project-Based Learning (PP), and Think–Pair–Share (TPS) at SDN Sidomulyo, Kotabaru Regency. The participants of this study were 14 elementary school students. The research employed a Classroom Action Research (CAR) design, which was carried out over three instructional meetings. Each cycle consisted of planning, implementation, observation, and reflection stages. Data were collected through observation sheets, assessments of student learning activities, and evaluation of learning outcomes. The results of the study showed a consistent improvement in teacher performance, student learning activities, and learning outcomes across the three meetings. Teacher activity scores increased from 60% in the first meeting to 78% in the second meeting and further improved to 85% in the third meeting. Similarly, student learning activity levels rose from 57% in the first meeting to 68% in the second meeting and reached 81% in the third meeting. In terms of learning outcomes, students demonstrated significant progress, with achievement levels increasing from 60% in the first meeting to 90% in the third meeting. These findings indicate that the integration of PBL, PP, and TPS models effectively promotes active learning, collaboration, and critical thinking skills among elementary school students. The combination of these instructional models encourages students to engage in problem-solving, discussion, and project-based activities, which positively impacts their learning performance. Therefore, it can be concluded that the combined application of PBL, PP, and TPS is effective in enhancing students’ critical thinking skills, learning activities, and overall learning outcomes in the classroom.

References

D. K. Rahmawati Edi and C. Anggreani, “Meningkatkan Berfikir Kritis Menggunakan Kombinasi Model PBL, PP, TPS di SDN Kabupaten Kotabaru,” Journal of Innovative and Creativity, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 1–10, 2025.

Daryanto, Inovasi Pembelajaran Efektif. Bandung: Yrama Widya, 2013.

R. Shoimin, 68 Model Pembelajaran Inovatif dalam Kurikulum 2013. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2014.

A. Suriansyah, Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu. Banjarmasin: Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, 2014.

Depdiknas, Standar Kompetensi Guru. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2011.

Trianto, Model-model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka, 2007.

M. Nur, Pembelajaran Berpikir Kritis. Surabaya: Unesa University Press, 2011.

D. Nanggala, “Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan dan Bela Negara,” Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 45–56, 2020.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2020.

H. Maolani, Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2015.

E. Ernawati, “Pembelajaran Aktif dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar,” Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 112–120, 2015.

D. Hamalik, Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2014.

D. Suprijono, Cooperative Learning: Teori dan Aplikasi PAIKEM. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2013.

Rusmono, Strategi Pembelajaran dengan Problem Based Learning. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia, 2017.

A. Jihad and A. Haris, Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Multi Pressindo, 2012.

A. Nata, Perspektif Islam tentang Strategi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana, 2011.

Downloads

Published

31-01-2026

How to Cite

Edi, D. K. R. ., & Anggreani, C. . (2026). Meningkatkan Berfikir Kritis Menggunakan Kombinasi Model PBL, PP, TPS di SDN Kabupaten Kotabaru. Journal of Innovative and Creativity (Joecy), 6(1), 6954–6960. https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v6i1.7420

Issue

Section

Articles