Analisis Struktur Modal Konservatif terhadap Optimalisasi Return on Equity: Studi Kasus PT Campina Ice Cream Industry, Tbk (2020-2024)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v6i1.6646Keywords:
Conservative Capital Structure, Return on Equity (ROE), DuPont Analysis, Net Profit Margin, PT Campina Ice Cream Industry, Tbk.Abstract
Conservative capital structure is a strategy focused on internal funding stability, which theoretically may limit the scope for optimizing shareholder returns. This study aims to analyze the optimization strategy of Return on Equity (ROE) at PT Campina Ice Cream Industry, Tbk during the 2020–2024 period under a conservative capital structure. The methodology employed is quantitative descriptive using financial ratio analysis and the DuPont Analysis approach. The results indicate that PT Campina maintains a very safe capital structure with a Debt to Equity Ratio (DER) of 0.1–0.2 times and a Debt to Asset Ratio (DAR) between 10.5%–13.7%. Low debt levels result in a low Equity Multiplier (1.11–1.16), shifting the burden of ROE optimization entirely onto net profit efficiency and asset productivity. ROE reached an optimal peak of 13.41% in 2023, driven by the highest Net Profit Margin (NPM) of 11.22%. However, in 2024, ROE declined to 10.43% due to operating expense pressures that pushed the NPM down to 8.38%. These findings confirm that under a conservative capital structure, ROE is highly vulnerable to fluctuations in operating costs. The primary recommended strategy is the careful control of operating expenses to enhance profit margins.
References
Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2011). Fundamentals of financial management (13th ed.). South-Western Cengage Learning.
Bates, T. W., Kahle, K. M., & Stulz, R. M. (2009). Why do U.S. firms hold so much more cash than they used to? The Journal of Finance, 64(5), 1985–2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01492.x
Byoun, S. (2008). How and when do firms adjust their capital structures toward targets? The Journal of Finance, 63(6), 3069–3096. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01421.x
Chadha, S., & Sharma, A. K. (2021). Capital structure and firm performance: Empirical evidence from India. Vision, 25(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972262920953331
Frank, M. Z., & Goyal, V. K. (2009). Capital structure decisions: Which factors are reliably important? Financial Management, 38(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2009.01026.x
Graham, J. R. (2000). How big are the tax benefits of debt? The Journal of Finance, 55(5), 1901–1941. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00277
Higgins, R. C. (1977). How much growth can a firm afford? Financial Management, 6(3), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/3665251
Kasmir. (2018). Analisis laporan keuangan. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Kraus, A., & Litzenberger, R. H. (1973). A state-preference model of optimal financial leverage. The Journal of Finance, 28(4), 911–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1973.tb01415.x
Le, T. P. V., & Phan, T. B. N. (2017). Capital structure and firm performance: Empirical evidence from a small transition country. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 710–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.07.012
Minton, B. A., & Wruck, K. H. (2001). Financial conservatism: Evidence on capital structure from low leverage firms. Review of Financial Studies, 14(4), 947–991. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/14.4.947
Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48(3), 261–297.
Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction. American Economic Review, 53(3), 433–443.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aryani Sri Ramadhani, Euis Novianty Lana, Sri Retnaning Sampurnaningsih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
