Risiko dan Return dalam Model Ekonomi Perusahaan Pelayaran: Implikasi Teoretis terhadap Ketahanan Logistik Kesehatan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v5i2.653Keywords:
risiko pelayaran, return investasi, logistik kesehatan, negara kepulauan, distribusi vaksin, shipping economicsAbstract
Sebagai negara kepulauan dengan lebih dari 17.000 pulau, Indonesia menghadapi tantangan besar dalam menjamin pemerataan layanan kesehatan, terutama di wilayah terpencil. Transportasi laut memegang peran vital sebagai tulang punggung logistik kesehatan nasional. Namun, keberlanjutan layanan pelayaran sangat dipengaruhi oleh dinamika risiko dan return dalam model ekonomi perusahaan pelayaran. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara sistematis keterkaitan antara risiko ekonomi pelayaran dan ketahanan logistik kesehatan di wilayah kepulauan. Dengan menggunakan metode systematic literature review (SLR) dan pendekatan naratif-deskriptif, literatur dikumpulkan dari basis data Scopus, ScienceDirect, dan Google Scholar. Sebanyak 42 artikel dipilih berdasarkan kriteria relevansi tematik dan kualitas metodologis. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa risiko operasional, risiko pasar, dan risiko regulasi menjadi faktor utama yang mempengaruhi keberlanjutan layanan pelayaran. Ketidakseimbangan antara risiko tinggi dan return rendah menyebabkan banyak perusahaan menghindari rute ke daerah non-komersial, yang berakibat pada keterlambatan distribusi logistik kesehatan. Penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya intervensi kebijakan dalam bentuk insentif berbasis risiko dan integrasi sistem pemantauan risiko ke dalam perencanaan logistik nasional. Rekomendasi bagi penelitian lanjutan adalah pengembangan model prediktif kuantitatif berbasis data real-time untuk mendukung pengambilan keputusan lintas sektor.
References
Barasa, E., Ouma, P. O., & Mbau, R. (2022). Financing healthcare logistics in resource-constrained settings: A public-private model. Global Health Action, 15(1), 2016652. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2022.2016652
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cullinane, K., & Bergqvist, R. (2014). Emission control areas and their impact on maritime transport. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 28, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.12.005
Jiang, C., & Hall, P. (2015). Freight shipping dynamics and supply chain vulnerability. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 17(2), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2014.33
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Keele University and Durham University Joint Report.
Lam, J. S. L., & Yap, W. Y. (2019). Financing sustainable port and shipping development. Maritime Policy & Management, 46(5), 461–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1537464
Ng, A. K. Y., Monios, J., & Wilmsmeier, G. (2021). Logistics resilience for island territories: Lessons from the pandemic. Transport Geography, 91, 102946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.102946
Notteboom, T. (2011). The impact of low-sulphur fuel requirements on shipping operations. Maritime Policy & Management, 38(6), 667–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2011.597448
Notteboom, T., & Rodrigue, J.-P. (2011). Challenges to port governance in the context of devolution. Transport Policy, 18(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.06.002
Pettit, T. J., Fiksel, J., & Croxton, K. L. (2010). Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development and implementation of an assessment tool. Journal of Business Logistics, 31(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2010.tb00125.x
Psaraftis, H. N. (2019). Sustainable Shipping: A Cross-disciplinary View. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04330-8
Rodrigue, J.-P., Notteboom, T., & Pallis, A. A. (2020). The Geography of Transport Systems (5th ed.). Routledge.
Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803
Stopford, M. (2009). Maritime Economics (3rd ed.). Routledge.
UNCTAD. (2020). Review of Maritime Transport 2020. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2020_en.pdf
Wang, Y., Cullinane, K., & Song, D. W. (2020). Risk assessment in maritime logistics: A review and future research directions. Transport Reviews, 40(1), 66–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2019.1685416
World Health Organization. (2022). Health Logistics in Island and Remote Areas: Global Guidelines. Geneva: WHO Press.
Zhang, W., & Lam, J. S. L. (2019). Risk assessment and simulation in maritime logistics networks. Maritime Policy & Management, 46(3), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1520151
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Elna Sari, Eliyanti Agus Mokodompit

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







