Vocabulary Ability of University Students in Identify Nouns in Descriptive Texts from The Jakarta Post: An Analysis

Authors

  • Cici Situmorang Institut Prima Bangsa
  • Hilwa Salsa Bilah Institut Prima Bangsa
  • Lisda Tri Aurora Institut Prima Bangsa
  • Sanija Sanija Institut Prima Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v6i1.6520

Keywords:

Vocabulary Ability, Noun Identification, Descriptive Text

Abstract

The paper focuses on the capabilities of students from the Prima Bangsa Institute to identify nouns from descriptive texts sourced from The Jakarta Post edition published on November 1, 2025. The approach of the study was qualitative descriptive, aided by instruments constructed in a multiple-choice tests and interviews.The multiple-choice test has the objective to identify the capabilities of students to identify and differentiate nouns according to their categories, including common nouns, proper nouns, abstract nouns, and collective nouns. Meanwhile, interviews could identify the problems encountered by learners during the learning process. Based on the average scores achieved, students' capabilities to identify nouns reached 56 and were under the category of fairly good. The most easily recognized noun for students was the common noun, while abstract nouns, proper nouns, and collective nouns were not yet fully understood by students. The problems were dominated by less mastery of students on English vocabulary and less mastery of understanding meanings of words based on context, especially when students encounter real texts for the first time. In light of the findings, this study underlines the significance of context-based vocabulary mastery of nouns to increase students' mastery of descriptive texts of the English language.

References

Agustinasari, E., Simanjuntak, T., & Purwanto, M. B. (2022). A Review on Error Analysis Stages in Teaching English Structure. Pioneer: Journal of Language and Literature, 14(1), 253. https://doi.org/10.36841/pioneer.v14i1.1702

Fitra Prisuna, B. (2021). Pengaruh Penggunaan Aplikasi Google Meet terhadap Hasil Belajar. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 14(2), 45–49. http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpiphttps://doi.org/10.21831/jpipfip.v14i1.39160

Furidha, B. W. (2024). Comprehension of the Descriptive Qualitative Research Method: a Critical Assessment of the Literature. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.56943/jmr.v2i4.443

Harahap, D. I., Uswar, Y., Andriani, N., Sudarwita, N., & Maysaroh, E. (2025). Corpus Linguistics in Teaching Vocabulary for EFL Learners: A Study of Foreign Speakers. English Education Journal, 16(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.24815/eej.v16i1.41762

Hari Sugiharto Setyaedhi, & Rusijono, R. (2025). Quality of Multiple-Choice Statistics Test Items to Measure Student Reasoning. Jurnal Edutech Undiksha, 13(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.23887/jeu.v13i1.82787

Hasimi, D. M. (2020). Analisis Program Bantuan Pangan Non Tunai (BPNT) guna meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat dalam perspektif ekonomi Islam. REVENUE: Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Islam, 1(1), 81-94. Fihris: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 16(1), 40–59.

Irawan, Y., Rani, A., Candra, D., Pratama, R. S., & Wicaksono, A. (2024). Development of a microcontroller-based detection tool for repulsion failure in long jump ( dekto-lj ). 20(2), 16–26.

Lina. (2021). Penggunaangoogle Formdalam Evaluasi Hasilbelajarpeserta Didik Di Masa Pandemi C0Vid-19. 1(3), 1–23.

Lisa, L., Sabarun, S., & Normuliati, S. (2023). The Correlation Between Vocabulary Mastery and Students’ Descriptive Writing Skills. Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 6(3), 658–670. https://doi.org/10.33503/journey.v6i3.3737

Musyafii, H., & Sari, N. (2024). An Analysis of Student Vocabulary in Finding Noun Trought Descriptive Text at SDN 013 Laboy Jaya. Journal of English Language and Education, 9(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v9i1.347

Oc, Y., & Hassen, H. (2025). Comparing The Effectiveness Of Multiple-Answer And Single-Answer Multiple-Choice Questions In Assessing Student Learning. Marketing Education Review, 35(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2024.2417106

Olenik, N. (2021). Adeoye‐Olatunde, O. A., & Olenik, N. L. (2021)..pdf.

Rinaldi, R., & Prastikawati, E. F. (2022). Google Form as an Online Assessment Tool to Improve the Students ’ Vocabulary Mastery. 3(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v3i1.307

Rosyada-AS, A., & Apoko, T. W. (2023). Investigating English Vocabulary Difficulties and Its Learning Strategies of Lower Secondary School Students. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11(3), 489. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i3.8404

Sinaga, R. A., Tambunan, N. A., Sitanggang, Y. J., Sinaga, M. A., & Sitanggang, A. (2025). An Analysis Of Noun Types In President Prabowo Subianto ’ s Speech On State Asset Repossession In The Jakarta Post. 5, 4542–4557.

Suherlan, H., Adriani, Y., Pah, D., Fauziyyah, I., Evangelin, B., Wibowo, L., Hanafi, M., & Rahmatika, C. (2022). Keterlibatan Masyarakat dalam Mendukung Program Desa Wisata. Barista : Jurnal Kajian Bahasa Dan Pariwisata, 9(1), 99–111. https://doi.org/10.34013/barista.v9i01.623

Downloads

Published

29-01-2026

How to Cite

Situmorang, C., Bilah, H. S., Aurora, L. T., & Sanija, S. (2026). Vocabulary Ability of University Students in Identify Nouns in Descriptive Texts from The Jakarta Post: An Analysis. Journal of Innovative and Creativity, 6(1), 6453–6461. https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v6i1.6520

Issue

Section

Articles