Strategi Algoritmik Sistematis untuk Pemecahan Masalah Jarak dan Sudut pada Materi Dimensi Tiga
Strategi Algoritmik Sistematis untuk Pemecahan Masalah Jarak dan Sudut pada Materi Dimensi Tiga
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v5i3.4595Keywords:
three dimensions, algorithmic strategies, distance and angle, spatial reasoning, spatial geometry.Abstract
Three-dimensional material, particularly the topic of distance and angles between geometric elements, is one of the most difficult parts for high school students because it requires high visualization and spatial reasoning skills. This study aims to develop a systematic algorithmic strategy to solve distance and angle problems in three-dimensional space in a more structured and student-friendly manner. The research approach used is qualitative-descriptive with analysis of textbooks, curriculum documents, and empirical experiences in teaching spatial geometry. The results of the study produced two main algorithms, namely the distance algorithm and the angle algorithm, each of which is arranged in logical steps starting from translating the problem into a drawing, identifying auxiliary triangles, analyzing the types of triangles, to applying relevant trigonometric theorems such as Pythagoras and the cosine rule. This strategy has been proven to strengthen the connection between students' conceptual understanding and procedural skills in solving problems. The systematic application of algorithms helps students build spatial visualization skills, improve thinking efficiency, and foster algorithmic thinking patterns in mathematics learning.
References
Aditya, Pandu, and Cecli Hiltrimartin. 2024. “Development of Problem-Solving-Based Digital Learning Media for Flat-Sided 3D Geometry in Junior High School.” JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika) 8(1):58. doi: 10.31764/jtam.v8i1.17018.
Angeli, Charoula, and Michail Giannakos. 2020. “Computational Thinking Education: Issues and Challenges.” Computers in Human Behavior 105(April):1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.106185.
Fujita, Taro, Yutaka Kondo, Hiroyuki Kumakura, Susumu Kunimune, and Keith Jones. 2020. “Spatial Reasoning Skills about 2D Representations of 3D Geometrical Shapes in Grades 4 to 9.” Mathematics Education Research Journal 32(2):235–55. doi: 10.1007/s13394-020-00335-w.
Pangaribuan, Firman, Ropinus Sidabutar, and Rani Darmayanti. 2025. “Exploring High School Students’ 3D Geometry Problem-Solving: Role of Cognitive Style and Mathematical Ability.” Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 16(1):363–76. doi: 10.24042/ajpm.v16i1.24361.
Santos-Trigo, Manuel. 2024. “Problem Solving in Mathematics Education: Tracing Its Foundations and Current Research-Practice Trends.” ZDM - Mathematics Education 56(2):211–22. doi: 10.1007/s11858-024-01578-8.
Sudirman, Runisah, Yaya S. Kusumah, Bambang A. Priatna Martadiputra. 2023. “Epistemological Obstacle in 3D Geometry Thinking: Representation, Spatial Structuring, and Measurement.” Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction 13(4). doi: 10.47750/pegegog.13.04.34.
Suhardiman Darson Tamu, Ricki Yuliardi. 2025. “Estimasi Nilai Π Berbasis Pendekatan Geometri Dengan Menghitung Luas Dan Keliling Poligon Beraturan.” Jumlahku Vol. 11:110–20.
Tamu, Suhardiman Darson, Evi Hulukati, and Ismail Djakaria. 2020. “Pengembangan Modul Dan Video Pembelajaran Matematika Persiapan Ujian Nasional Pada Materi Dimensi Tiga.” Jambura Journal of Mathematics Education 1(1):21–31. doi: 10.34312/jmathedu.v1i1.4558.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Suhardiman Darson Tamu, Nosva Adam Yunus, Febiyanti R. Hasan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





