Analisis Pemahaman Konseptual Bangun Ruang Siswa Kelas V di MI Safinatun Najah

Authors

  • Dewi Tri Lestari Institut Agama Islam Khozinatul Ulum Blora
  • Cahya Amalia Chusna Institut Agama Islam Khozinatul Ulum Blora
  • Armiya Nur Lailatul Izzah Institut Agama Islam Khozinatul Ulum Blora

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v5i3.4445

Keywords:

Conceptual Understanding, Solid Geometry, Conceptual Errors, Manipulative Media, Contextual Approach

Abstract

This study aims to describe the level of conceptual understanding of fifth-grade students at MI Safinatun Najah regarding solid geometry, identify conceptual errors that arise, and analyze factors influencing their understanding. The method used is a qualitative approach with a descriptive design. The subject involved 12 students selected based on high, medium, and low understanding categories, along with the fifth-grade mathematics teacher. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, observations, and document studies. Analysis was conducted through data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing accompanied by verification. The results showed significant variation in students’ conceptual understanding. Some students could explain the elements of solid geometry and relate them to contextual problems, while others were still trapped in rote memorization of formulas. The findings also revealed that procedural skills were more dominant than conceptual understanding, and concrete as well as visual media played an important role in strengthening comprehension. This study indicates that students’ understanding is not uniform but influenced by both internal and external factors. Therefore, learning strategies based on manipulative and contextual media are necessary to improve the quality of their understanding.

References

Battista, M. T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 843–908). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

Battista, M. T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 843–908). Information Age Publishing.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Gilligan-Lee et al. (2022). Spatial visualization skills and geometry learning in elementary education: A global perspective, International Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), 210–225.

Ilhami, A. H., & Fathoni, T. (2025). Kepemimpinan Visioner Kepala Sekolah Dalam Mewujudkan Pendidikan Berbasis Masa Depan. AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584), 5(2), 611–624.

Muslih, M., Izzulhaq, M. I., & Fathoni, T. (2025). Bimbingan Konseling Dalam Menyikapi Perubahan Fisik Dan Emosi Remaja. AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584), 5(2), 331–340.

Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Liandri, Pengaruh media konkret terhadap pemahaman konsep geometri siswa, Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 8(1), 23–34 (2025).

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Mayberry, J. P. (1983). The van Hiele model of the development of geometric thought. Learning and Teaching Geometry, K-12, 1, 7-15.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Sari. (2023). Efektivitas lembar kerja berbasis konteks dalam pembelajaran matematika SD, Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 12(2), 98–106.

Usiskin, Z. (1982). Van Hiele levels and achievement in secondary school geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13(1), 31-48.

Downloads

Published

28-10-2025

How to Cite

Lestari, D. T. ., Chusna, C. A. ., & Izzah, A. N. L. . (2025). Analisis Pemahaman Konseptual Bangun Ruang Siswa Kelas V di MI Safinatun Najah. Journal of Innovative and Creativity (Joecy), 5(3), 29503–29511. https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v5i3.4445

Issue

Section

Articles