Comparison Of BIM And CAD Efficiency In The Planning Phase: A Case Study Of The Construction At PT. Sinar Meadow International Indonesia, Jakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v5i2.3032Keywords:
BIM Building Information Modelling, CAD Computer-Aided Design , Design Efficiency, Clash Detection, QTO Quantity Take OffAbstract
The rapid development of BIM and CAD greatly influences the world of architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) today, both in the project planning phase, project implementation phase, operational phase, and until demolish. This makes favorite software such as revit and autocad the standard for practitioners and scientists in the AEC world. This study aims to determine the efficiency and effectiveness of using BIM revit and CAD autocad in planning development projects at PT. Sinar Meadow International Indonesia. Such as design speed, clash detection effectiveness, and efficiency and effectiveness in quantity takeoff. This study uses an experimental observation method with analysis of variance. is a test designed to find the relationship between the two variables comparing between research samples. The research instrument is used in collecting primary data between CAD autocad observations and BIM revit.The results of the analysis of the structural, architectural, and mechanical electrical planning drawing experiments explain that the design using BIM revit is 31% faster than using CAD autocad. While in clash detection, revit with interference check tools found 44 cases compared to 3 cases of manual autocad. For quantity take off work, Revit software uses schedule/quantities tools 260% faster than using conventional with AutoCAD software and AutoCAD is 4% cheaper than Revit software..
References
G. O. Deniz, "Emerging cad and bim trends in the aec education: An analysis from student's perspective," Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), vol. 23, pp. 138-156, 2018.
J. J. Maina, "CAD and BIM in architectural education: Awareness, proficiency and advantages from the student perspective.," Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 167-178, 2018.
S. A. Jones and D. Laquidara-Carr, The business value of BIM for infrastructure 2017, Dodge Data & Analytics, 2017.
I. Rahmani and B. Herumanta, "Comparison Of Estimation Of Reinforced Concrete Structure Working Costs Based On The Concept Of Computer-Aided Design (Cad) And Building Information Modeling (Bim)," Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, vol. 01, pp. 1237-1244, 2022.
R. N. A'la, "The BIM Implementation for Preparing Mutual Check-0 (MC-0) Documents in the Building Development Project of Edusmart Soerojo Hospital Magelang," Inersia : Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Arsitektur, vol. 18, no. 02, pp. 113-121, December 2022.
M. Mamdouh, O. Moursy, A. A. Hassan and V. F. Gerges, "A comparison between CAD system and building information," IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 1396, pp. 1-11, 2024.
M. Ristevski, M. Karakašić, I. Grgić and D. Šotola, "Technical aspect of CAD and BIM technology in the engineering environment," Tehnički glasnik, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 271-274, 2018.
A. Primasetra, D. Larasati and S. Wonorahardjo, "BIM Utilization in Improving Energy Efficiency Performance on Architectural Design Process: Challenges and Opportunities," IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 1058, pp. 1-12, 2022.
Direktorat Kelembagaan dan Sumber Daya Konstruksi, Standar Protokol BIM di Kementerian PUPR, Jakarta: Perpustakaan Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat 2020, 2020.
J. T. Snæbjörnsson, I. B. Kjartansdóttir, S. Mordue, P. Nowak and D. Philp, BUILDING INFORMATION MODELLING – BIM, Warszawa: Civil Engineering Faculty of Warsaw University of Technology, 2017, pp. 24-26.
M. D. Ferdiana, Dasar-Dasar Menggambar Bangunan, Yogyakarta: TAKA Publisher, 2014.
W. O. Kilmer and R. Kilmer, Construction Drawings And Details for Interiors: Basic Skills, Danvers: John Wiley & Sons, inc., 2003.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ashar Herrianto, Monica Dewi, Inge Anggitasari, Susilowati Susilowati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
