The Interaction Between Teacher Performance in Learning Implementation and Student Readiness on Social Science Learning Outcomes

Authors

  • Nurdin Nurdin Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Jakarta
  • Imam Suseno Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Jakarta
  • Ari Wahyu Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Jakarta
  • Albertus Marua Setyastanto Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Jakarta
  • Rinovian Rais Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v5i2.2225

Keywords:

Teacher Performance, Student Readiness, Learning Outcomes, Classroom Interaction, Social Science Education

Abstract

This study explores the interaction between teacher performance in conducting classroom learning and student readiness in relation to social science learning outcomes. A quantitative approach with a survey method was employed to collect data from senior high school students through structured questionnaires. The analysis reveals that both teacher performance and student readiness have a significant influence on student achievement when assessed individually. When considered simultaneously, the relationship remains statistically significant, although not particularly strong. These findings suggest that while teacher effectiveness and student preparedness are essential elements, other unexamined factors may also contribute to learning outcomes. The study underscores the importance of enhancing teacher competency through professional development and fostering student readiness through supportive learning environments. Such efforts are expected to create more meaningful and effective learning experiences that support academic success in the context of social science education.

References

Briggs, L. J. 1979. Introductional Design, Principles and Aplication Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey: Printice Hall, ins.

Davies, K. I. 1997. Instructional Technigue. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Djamarah, S. Bi. 2002.Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Ghufron, A. 2017. Pengembangan Pembelajaran Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Budaya Yogyakarta di Sekolah Dasar? Jurnal Ilmiah Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36 (2) : 310.

Gronlund, N. E.1997. Constructing Achievement Test. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.

Hilgard, E. R.1982.Introduction to Psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc.

Krissandi, A D S, dan Rusmawan. 2015. Kendala Guru Sekolah Dasar Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013? Jurnal Ilmiah Cakrawala Pendidikan, 34 (3) : 463.

Miarso, Y. Hadi dan Degang, I. S. 2004. Terapan Teori Kognitif dalam Desain Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Nasution, M.N. 1995.Manajemen Mutu Terpadu (Total Quality Management). Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Rapi, N. K. 2016. Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran dan Jenis Penilaian Formatif Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa SMPN? Jurnal Ilmiah Cakrawala Pendidikan, 35 (1): 70.

Reigeluth , C. M.1994. Instructional Design Theories and Model. Hillsdale New Jersey: Lawrence Eribaun associates, Publisher.

Slameto. 2003. Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Soedijarto. 1993. Menuju Pendidikan Nasional yang Relevan dan Bermutu. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Surya, M. 2004. Psikologi Pembelajaran dan Pengajaran. Bandung: Pustaka Bani Qurais.

Suryabrata, S .2000.Pengembangan Alat Ukur Psikologi.Yogyakarta: Andi Ofset.

Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20.2003. Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia.

Whitmore, J. 1997. Coaching for Permoncance, Alih Bahasa Y Dewi Helly Purnomo. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Downloads

Published

29-07-2025

How to Cite

Nurdin, N., Suseno, I., Wahyu, A., Setyastanto, A. M. ., & Rais, R. (2025). The Interaction Between Teacher Performance in Learning Implementation and Student Readiness on Social Science Learning Outcomes. Journal of Innovative and Creativity, 5(2), 10855–10861. https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v5i2.2225

Issue

Section

Articles