Dualitas Gender Dan Ambiguitas Identitas Dalam Love And Death In Bali Karya Vicki Baum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v5i2.1718Keywords:
Gender Duality, Identity Ambiguity, Queer Theory, Intersectional Feminism, Colonial LiteratureAbstract
This study examines the representation of gender duality and identity ambiguity in Vicki Baum’s novel Love and Death in Bali through the lenses of queer theory and intersectional feminism. Using a qualitative textual analysis approach, the research reveals that characters, especially Raka and Alit, exhibit fluid gender identities that defy the traditional masculine-feminine binary. Their bodily descriptions, clothing, and emotional expressions reflect gender performativity that challenges patriarchal norms both within Balinese customs and under Dutch colonial power. Additionally, the position of women in the novel is portrayed as oppressed by the overlapping forces of traditional authority and colonial domination, particularly through the regulation of their bodies and sexuality. This analysis argues that Love and Death in Bali not only documents the historical colonial reality but also opens critical discursive space about gender identity as complex, fractured, and political. By combining queer and intersectional perspectives, this study highlights the importance of rereading colonial literature as a site for producing meanings of identity that are fluid and unstable.
References
Ahmed, S. (2006). Queer phenomenology: Orientations, objects, others. Duke University Press.
Arivia, G. (2003). Feminisme: Sebuah kata hati. Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Barker, M., & Scheele, J. (2016). Queer: A graphic history. Icon Books.
Baum, V. (1937). Love and death in Bali. Geoffrey Bles.
Boellstorff, T. (2005). The gay archipelago: Sexuality and nation in Indonesia. Princeton University Press.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.
Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. Basic Books.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality, volume I: An introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). Pantheon.
Hoad, N. (2000). African intimacies: Race, homosexuality, and globalization. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 6(3), 465–485.
Hooks, b. (2000). Feminism is for everybody: Passionate politics. South End Press.
Lugones, M. (2007). Heterosexualism and the colonial/modern gender system. Hypatia, 22(1), 186–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2007.tb01156.x
Nash, J. C. (2008). Re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2008.4
O’Rourke, M. (2007). Queer theory: The ‘naming’ of the subject. E-Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 38(1), 54–65.
Probyn, E. (1993). Sexing the self: Gendered positions in cultural studies. Routledge.
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.
Stryker, S. (2008). Transgender history. Seal Press.
Suryakusuma, J. (2011). State Ibuism: The social construction of womanhood in New Order Indonesia. Komunitas Bambu.
Wieringa, S. (2002). Sexual politics in Indonesia. Journal of Homosexuality, 42(3), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1300/J082v42n03_10
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







