PEMAHAMAN SISWA TERHADAP ETIKA DIGITAL DALAM PENGGUNAAN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) UNTUK MENGERJAKAN TUGAS SEKOLAH PADA ANGGOTA EKSTRAKURIKULER PASKIBRA SMP NEGERI 2 PANONGAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v6i2.14613Keywords:
Etika Digital, Artificial Intelligence, Integritas Akademik, Berpikir Kritis, Paskibra, Digital Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, Academic Integrity, Critical Thinking, Flag Raising TeamAbstract
ABSTRAK
Perkembangan Artificial Intelligence (AI) berbasis Large Language Models (LLM) membawa tantangan serius terhadap integritas akademik di tingkat sekolah menengah. Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi pemahaman siswa terhadap etika digital dalam penggunaan AI untuk menyelesaikan tugas sekolah, berfokus pada anggota Paskibra SMP Negeri 2 Panongan yang memiliki karakteristik disiplin organisasi yang kuat. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif studi kasus, sampel penelitian ini berjumlah 50 siswa aktif yang dipilih melalui purposive sampling. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner tertutup skala Likert Modifikasi 4 poin yang telah valid () dan reliabel (). Analisis data menggunakan model reduksi, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan berbasis teori kewarganegaraan digital Mike Ribble. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan pemahaman etika digital siswa berada pada kategori Tinggi/Baik dengan rata-rata total 3,01. Berpikir kritis siswa sangat menonjol dalam memvalidasi informasi AI menggunakan buku paket sekolah. Nilai-nilai kedisiplinan dan doktrin organisasi Paskibra terbukti menjadi benteng internal siswa untuk mengutamakan daya juang mandiri sebelum mengakses AI. Namun, ditemukan ethical gaps berupa goyahnya integritas pada tugas eksakta serta kecemasan psikologis untuk melakukan transparansi penggunaan AI kepada guru.
ABSTRACT
The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) based on Large Language Models (LLM) poses serious challenges to academic integrity at the secondary school level. This study explores students' understanding of digital ethics in the use of AI to complete school assignments, focusing on members of the Paskibra (Flag Troops) of Panongan 2 Public Middle School, who exhibit strong organizational discipline. Using a qualitative descriptive case study approach, the sample of this study consisted of 50 active students selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through a closed-ended questionnaire with a 4-point Modified Likert scale that was valid (r_"count" >0.361) and reliable ("Cronbach's Alpha" = 0.863). Data analysis used a data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing model based on Mike Ribble's digital citizenship theory. The results showed that students' understanding of digital ethics was in the High/Good category with a total average of 3.01. Students' critical thinking was very prominent in validating AI information using school textbooks. The discipline values and doctrines of the Paskibra organization proved to be an internal fortress for students to prioritize independent fighting spirit before accessing AI. However, ethical gaps were identified, including wavering integrity in exact science assignments and psychological anxiety about providing transparency regarding AI use to teachers.
References
Bretag, T. (Ed.). (2016). Handbook of academic integrity. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-098-8
Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Edwards, A. L. (1957). Techniques of attitude scale construction. Ardent Media.
Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Measured Reasons LLC.
Fishman, T. (Ed.). (2014). The fundamental values of academic integrity. International Center for Academic Integrity.
Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Wiley.
Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages (Vol. 2). Harper & Row.
Luckin, R. (2018). Machine learning and human intelligence: The future of education for the 21st century. UCL Institute of Education Press.
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2020). Critical thinking: Tools for taking charge of your professional and personal life (2nd ed.). Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Pearson, K. (1895). VII. Note on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 58(347–352), 240–242. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspl.1895.0041
Piaget, J. (1972). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 15(1), 1–12.
Purna Paskibraka Indonesia. (2021). Anggaran dasar dan anggaran rumah tangga Purna Paskibraka Indonesia. Pengurus Pusat Purna Paskibraka Indonesia.
Ribble, M., & Bailey, G. D. (2011). Digital citizenship in schools (2nd ed.). International Society for Technology in Education.
Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
UNESCO. (2018). A global framework of reference on digital literacy skills for indicator 4.4.2. UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muniroh Intan Nuraini, Sayyid Agil Arrahman, Gunawan Gunawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
