SATU EMOJI, BANYAK MAKNA: ANALISIS SEMIOPRAGMATIS DALAM TANDA DALAM KOMUNIKASI DIGITAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v6i2.14492Keywords:
Emoji, Semiotika, Pragmatik, Komunikasi Digital, Polisemi, Inversi Semantik, Literasi Digital, Generasi Z, Emoji, Semiotics, Pragmatics, Digital Communication, Polysemy, Semantic Inversion, Digital Literacy, Generation ZAbstract
ABSTRAK
Emoji telah berevolusi dari sekadar hiasan visual menjadi sistem tanda yang kompleks dalam komunikasi digital. Artikel ini mengkaji emoji melalui pendekatan semiopragmatis perpaduan antara semiotika Peircean dan pragmatik kontekstual untuk mengungkap bagaimana satu ikon visual yang sama dapat menghasilkan spektrum makna yang luas bergantung pada konteks tuturan, relasi penutur, platform digital, dan latar budaya. Melalui survei terhadap 65 responden digital native Generasi Z, analisis menunjukkan bahwa emoji berfungsi sebagai tanda trikotomis yang maknanya bersifat dinamis, polisemis, dan sangat terikat pada konteks pragmatis. Temuan empiris mengungkap inversi semantik total pada beberapa emoji, konvensi komunitas yang menggantikan makna ikonik, serta fungsi agresivitas terselubung melalui tanda visual yang tampak polos.
ABSTRACT
Emojis have evolved from mere visual decorations into complex sign systems in digital communication. This article examines emojis through a semiopragmatic approach, a blend of Peircean semiotics and contextual pragmatics, to reveal how the same visual icon can generate a broad spectrum of meanings depending on the context of the utterance, the speaker's relationship, the digital platform, and the cultural background. Through a survey of 65 digital native Generation Z respondents, the analysis shows that emojis function as trichotomous signs whose meanings are dynamic, polysemous, and deeply tied to pragmatic context. Empirical findings reveal complete semantic inversion in some emojis, community conventions that supersede iconic meanings, and a disguised aggressive function through seemingly innocent visual signs.
References
Alshaboul, Y. M. (2026). Emoji interpretation in digital discourse: A semiopragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics and Digital Communication, 12(1), 45–61.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Koltsova, O., & Kartashkova, E. (2022). Emoji as semiotic resources in online communication: Meanings and contextual variability. Social Semiotics, 32(4), 567–583.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
Li, L., & Yang, Y. (2018). Pragmatic functions of emoji in computer-mediated communication. Discourse, Context & Media, 26, 32–38.
Pardede, H., & Damanik, R. (2025). Emoji sebagai penanda sikap dan substitusi unsur bahasa dalam komunikasi digital. Jurnal Linguistik Indonesia, 43(1), 55–70.
Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. 1–8). Harvard University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aisyah Awwab, Arina Darojatul Ula Romadlona, Hafsyah Eka Putri, Lucky Amru

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





