The Effect of Physical Work Environment, Non-Physical Work Environment, and Motivation on Employee Performance at BAPPENDA of West Nusa Tenggara Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v6i2.14420Keywords:
Physical Work Environment, Non-Physical Work Environment, Motivation, Employee Performance, BAPPENDAAbstract
The study purpose was to analyze the effect of physical work environment, non-physical work environment, and motivation on employee performance at the Regional Revenue Management Agency (BAPPENDA) of West Nusa Tenggara Province. The study was conducted based on the importance of a conducive work environment and adequate employee motivation in supporting the achievement of organizational performance.
Materials and methods. This study employed a quantitative approach. The population consisted of 134 employees of BAPPENDA of West Nusa Tenggara Province, with 100 respondents selected as the research sample. Data were collected through questionnaires and analyzed using multiple linear regression. The analysis included partial significance testing (t-test), simultaneous significance testing (F-test), and the coefficient of determination (R²).
Results. The results showed that the physical work environment had a positive and significant effect on employee performance, with a t-value of 6.512 and a significance value of less than 0.001. The non-physical work environment did not have a significant effect on employee performance, with a t-value of -0.960 and a significance value of 0.339. Meanwhile, motivation had a positive and significant effect on employee performance, with a t-value of 2.528 and a significance value of 0.013. Simultaneously, physical work environment, non-physical work environment, and motivation had a significant effect on employee performance, as indicated by an F-value of 20.091 and a significance value of less than 0.001. The adjusted coefficient of determination was 0.366, indicating that the three independent variables explained 36.6% of the variation in employee performance.
Conclusions. Physical work environment and motivation significantly contributed to employee performance, whereas non-physical work environment did not show a significant partial effect. Simultaneously, the three variables significantly affected employee performance at BAPPENDA of West Nusa Tenggara Province.
References
Afandi, P. (2018). Manajemen sumber daya manusia: Teori, konsep dan indikator. Zanafa Publishing.
Arifa, S., & Muhsin, M. (2018). Pengaruh disiplin kerja, kepemimpinan dan lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja melalui motivasi kerja. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 7(1), 374–389.
Bachtiar, D. (2012). Pengaruh motivasi dan lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja karyawan. Management Analysis Journal, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/maj.v1i1.502
Busro, M. (2018). Teori-teori manajemen sumber daya manusia. Prenadamedia Group.
Dessler, G. (2020). Human resource management (16th ed.). Pearson.
Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Hanafi, K. M., & Syah, T. Y. R. (2021). The moderating role of demographic factors in the relationship among job satisfaction, work environment, work motivation to employee performance. JDM (Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen), 12(1).
Hasibuan, M. S. P. (2019). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Bumi Aksara.
Kasmir. (2019). Manajemen sumber daya manusia: Teori dan praktik. Rajawali Pers.
Kuswantoro, A., & Zaidaan, A. (2023). Influence of work motivation, work environment, and employee competence on employee performance through organizational commitment as intervening variable. Economic Education Analysis Journal, 154–164. https://doi.org/10.15294/eeaj.v1i1.75401
Mangkunegara, A. A. A. P. (2017). Manajemen sumber daya manusia perusahaan. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mursidah, S., Khoiruddin, M., & Septantri, L. (2023). The influence of work culture, environment, and motivation on the academic staff performance in Universitas Negeri Semarang. Management Analysis Journal, 12(3), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.15294/maj.v12i3.71298
Nurwati, A. (2021). The influence of the work environment and competence on employee performance mediated by the motivation of the case study work on special Waroeng Sambal “SS” in Yogyakarta. Jurnal Studi Manajemen Organisasi, 16(2), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.14710/jsmo.v16i2.28825
Pratama, R., & Mujiati, N. W. (2019). Pengaruh lingkungan kerja dan motivasi terhadap kinerja pegawai. E-Jurnal Manajemen, 8(5), 3025–3045.
Ridlo, M., Rozaq, M. A., Saputra, Y., & Mochlasin. (2022). Moderation of Islamic work ethic variables on the influence of work environment, work motivation, work culture and compensation on employee performance. Management Analysis Journal, 11(1), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.15294/maj.v11i1.54793
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2019). Organizational behavior (18th ed.). Pearson.
Sedarmayanti. (2017). Perencanaan dan pengembangan sumber daya manusia untuk meningkatkan kompetensi, kinerja, dan produktivitas kerja. PT Refika Aditama.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Alfabeta.
Sutrisno, E. (2019). Manajemen sumber daya manusia. Kencana.
Wibowo. (2019). Manajemen kinerja (5th ed.). Rajawali Pers.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Andini Putri, Irwan Cahyadi, Ega Dwi Putri Marswandi, Febria Nurmelia Marlina, Ika Yuliana
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
