Silent Treatment Terhadap Mahasiswa Akhir: Tinjauan Sosiologis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v5i2.1426Keywords:
Final Student, Interpersonal Relationship, Passive Communication, Silent Treatment, Social InteractionAbstract
Silent treatment as a form of passive-aggressive communication triggers negative impacts on social relationships and individual psychological well-being. The study aims to understand the meaning of silent treatment from supervisors to final students and analyze the social impact that occurs in the final student environment, such as explaining the impact of silent treatment on students social condit, namely stress and social exclusion. This research uses a qualitative method based on the theory of symbolic interactionism, where the theory emphasizes social meaning can be formed through interactions and also individual interpretations of symbols, language actions including silence or silent treatment, in this study we used five informants of final students of Sociology at Riau University. It can be concluded that social education and counseling services ae needed to prevent silent treatment among final year students.
References
Abubakar, Fauzi. 2015. Pengaruh Komunikasi Interpersonal Antara Dosen Dan Mahasiswa Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Dan Prestasi Akademik Mahasiswa Effect Of Interpersonal Communication Between Lecturer And Students Of Learning And Achievement Motivation For Students. Vol. 18.
Arif Andhika, Wisnu, Joyo Nur Suryanto Gono, Turnomo Rahardjo, Wiwid Noor Rakhmad, Program S. Studi, And Ilmu Komunikasi. N.D. Pengelolaan Kecemasan Komunikasi Mahasiswa Tingkat Akhir Terhadap Dosen Pembimbing Pada Proses Penyusunan Skripsi.
Citraningsih, Diningrum, And Hanifah Noviandari. 2022. “Interaksionisme Simbolik: Peran Kepemimpinan Dalam Pengambilan Keputusan.” Social Science Studies 2(1):072–086. Doi:10.47153/Sss21.3152022.
Danuarta Wijaya, Amal. N.D. Dampak Rendahnya Self Efficacy Pada Mahasiswa Tingkat Akhir: Sebuah Studi Literatur.
Derung, Teresia Noiman. N.D. Interaksionisme Simbolik Dalam Kehidupan Bermasyarakat.
Gunawati, Rindang, Sri Hartati, And Anita Listiara. 2006. Hubungan Antara Efektivitas Komunikasi Mahasiswa-Dosen Pembimbing Utama Skripsi Dengan Stres Dalam Menyusun Skripsi Pada Mahasiswa Program Studi Psikologi Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Diponegoro. Vol. 3.
Khaerul Kholidi, Ahmad, And Adi Faizun. 2022. “At-Ta’lim: Studi Al-Qur’an Dan Hadits Interaksionisme Simbolik George Herbert Mead Di Era New Normal Pasca Covid 19 Di Indonesia.” 2(1).
Munaya Rahman, Akhmad, M. Adhitya Hidayat Putra, Kata Kunci, Kompetensi Pedagogik, And Motivasi Belajar. 2019. Pengaruh Kompetensi Pedagogik Dosen Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa Pendidikan Ips. Vol. X. Cetak.
Mutawakkil, Mutawakkil, And Nuraedah Nuraedah. 2019. “Gaya Komunikasi Dosen Dalam Pembelajaran Mahasiswa.” Communicatus: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi 3(2):135–52. Doi:10.15575/Cjik.V3i2.5765.
Prima Tiara, Putri. N.D. “Humantech Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Disiplin Indonesia Makna Gaya Hidup Sehat Dalam Perpektif Teori Interaksionisme Simbolik.”
Safitri, Susiana Nur, Puji Lestari, Garmadyuti Suryawijaya, And Nadia Adzka. N.D. “Pengaruh Kompetensi Komunikasi Hati Terhadap Perilaku Silent Treatment.” Doi:10.25008/Wartaiski.V7i2.303.
Siti, Nina, And Salmaniah Siregar. N.D. Kajian Tentang Interaksionisme Simbolik.
Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif.
Syafirah. 2024. “933513619_Bab1 (2).”
Zanki Haritz Asmi. N.D. Teori Psikologi Dan Sosial Pendidikan (Teori Interaksi Simbolik).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aura Yuwanda, Masitah Sri Rayawati, Sarah Aulia Nanda, Ade Mere Dewa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
