Ethical Issues in Using Jasper AI and Scribbr for Academic Writing among University Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v5i1.1347Keywords:
artificial intelligence, Jasper AI, Scribbr, academic writingAbstract
The growing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in higher education has transformed students’ approaches to academic writing. This study investigates the ethical issues arising from the use of Jasper AI and Scribbr among Indonesian university students. Employing a qualitative descriptive design, semi-structured interviews were conducted with sixteen students from diverse disciplines alongside a review of institutional documents. Thematic analysis revealed three main findings: (1) students commonly use Jasper AI for idea generation and drafting while relying on Scribbr for plagiarism checking and proofreading; (2) although these tools enhance writing efficiency and confidence, they also raise concerns about overdependence and diminished critical thinking; and (3) there is limited awareness and inconsistent understanding of institutional guidelines regarding AI-assisted writing, leading to blurred ethical boundaries. These findings highlight an urgent need for universities to update academic integrity policies and integrate AI ethics education into writing instruction. By addressing these gaps, higher education institutions can support responsible and informed use of AI tools while safeguarding the core values of academic honesty and originality.
References
Arifin, Z., Rahmat, A., & Sari, N. P. (2023). Academic integrity awareness among Indonesian university students in the digital era. Journal of Education and Learning, 17(1), 45–52.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Bretag, T. (2016). Challenges in addressing plagiarism in education. PLOS Medicine, 13(12), e1002183.
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2023). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(2), 136–147.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M. M., Dennehy, D., Upadhyay, N., & Janssen, M. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.
Kohnke, L., Zou, D., & Zhang, R. (2023). Exploring student and teacher perceptions on AI in language education. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(1–2), 182–206.
Pham, T., & Ho, T. (2023). Students’ perceptions of ChatGPT’s impacts on education: Benefits, challenges, and recommendations. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 46.
Rohana, I., Subekti, A., & Anshari, M. (2021). Digital literacy among Indonesian students: A review of policies and practices. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 11(1), 67–77.
Sari, N. P., Arifin, Z., & Suryani, N. (2023). Rethinking plagiarism in the age of artificial intelligence: A study of Indonesian university students. Indonesian Journal of Education, 6(2), 122–130.
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Altinay, F., Altinay, Z., & Burgos, D. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Recent trends and future research directions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39.
Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 15(1), 1–14.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Agung Rinaldy Malik

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





