Risk Management Practices and Financial Stability in Conventional Commercial Banks: A Systematic Literature Review of Scopus Q1–Q2 Articles (2019–2024)

Authors

  • Khairil Anwar Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
  • Pardomuan Pardosi Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v6i2.12943

Keywords:

risk management; financial stability; conventional commercial banks; enterprise risk management; systemic risk.

Abstract

This study provides a systematic literature review of empirical and theoretical research examining the relationship between risk management practices and financial stability in conventional commercial banks. Using the PRISMA methodology, the review synthesizes evidence from more than 100 peer-reviewed articles published in Scopus-indexed Q1–Q2 journals between 2019 and 2024. The review focuses exclusively on conventional commercial banks and analyzes how different categories of risk—credit, liquidity, market, operational, and systemic risk—are managed within contemporary regulatory and governance frameworks.The findings indicate that credit and liquidity risks remain the dominant sources of bank fragility, particularly during periods of macroeconomic stress. Empirical evidence consistently shows that effective credit risk controls and adequate liquidity buffers enhance bank-level resilience, although the magnitude of their stabilizing effects varies across institutional and regional contexts. The review further highlights the growing importance of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) and Basel III regulatory instruments, including capital buffers and stress testing, in mitigating excessive risk-taking and strengthening shock absorption capacity. However, the effectiveness of these mechanisms is not uniform, as differences in governance quality, market structure, and regulatory enforcement shape risk outcomes. At the systemic level, the literature suggests that well-capitalized banks with integrated risk governance contribute to overall financial stability by reducing contagion risk and supporting credit provision during crises. Nonetheless, several gaps remain, particularly regarding the interaction between risk culture, technological risk, and macroprudential policy effectiveness in emerging markets. By critically synthesizing recent high-quality evidence, this review contributes to the banking and financial stability literature and offers policy-relevant insights for regulators and bank managers seeking to enhance the resilience of conventional commercial banking systems.

References

Acharya, V. V., Engle, R., & Richardson, M. (2019). Capital shortfall: A new approach to ranking and regulating systemic risks.

American Economic Review, 109(2), 1–38.

https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20180419

Altunbas, Y., Gambacorta, L., & Marques-Ibanez, D. (2022). Do bank characteristics influence the effectiveness of capital buffers?

Journal of Financial Stability, 58, 100971.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100971

Anginer, D., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Zhu, M. (2019). How does competition affect bank systemic risk?

Journal of Financial Intermediation, 39, 1–15.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2018.05.001

Adusei, M., & Obeng, E. Y. T. (2021). Credit risk, capital adequacy and bank stability: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa.

Journal of Banking Regulation, 22(3), 212–230.

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-020-00133-5

Berger, A. N., Imbierowicz, B., & Rauch, C. (2021). The roles of corporate governance in bank failures during the recent financial crisis.

Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 53(1), 55–96.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12787

Brei, M., Gambacorta, L., & von Peter, G. (2020). Rescue packages and bank lending.

Journal of Banking & Finance, 112, 105236.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.01.003

Danisman, G. O. (2022). Bank risk-taking under Basel III: Evidence from emerging markets.

Journal of Banking Regulation, 23(4), 318–337.

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-022-00192-3

Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Martinez Peria, M. S., & Tressel, T. (2020). The global financial crisis and bank lending in emerging markets.

Journal of International Money and Finance, 101, 102077.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2019.102077

Duong, H. N., Wu, E., & Nguyen, D. K. (2020). Bank liquidity risk and financial stability.

International Review of Financial Analysis, 69, 101461.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101461

Jiménez, G., Ongena, S., Peydró, J. L., & Saurina, J. (2020). Macroprudential policy, countercyclical bank capital buffers, and credit supply.

Review of Economic Studies, 87(2), 1–40.

https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdz050

Laeven, L., Ratnovski, L., & Tong, H. (2021). Bank size, capital, and systemic risk.

Journal of Banking & Finance, 124, 106041.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2020.106041

Lepetit, L., & Strobel, F. (2021). Bank insolvency risk and macroeconomic shocks.

Journal of Financial Stability, 53, 100844.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2020.100844

Nguyen, M., Skully, M., & Perera, S. (2021). Bank market power, ownership, and risk-taking.

Journal of Banking & Finance, 123, 105772.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.105772

Ozili, P. K. (2021). Bank risk management and financial stability during COVID-19.

International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(1), 1–17.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2436

Saeed, A., & Zahid, N. (2020). The impact of credit risk on profitability of banks.

Journal of Banking Regulation, 21(1), 1–16.

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-019-00090-2

Vallascas, F., & Keasey, K. (2020). Bank resilience to systemic shocks.

Journal of Banking & Finance, 112, 105191.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.105191

Downloads

Published

22-07-2026

How to Cite

Khairil Anwar, & Pardomuan Pardosi. (2026). Risk Management Practices and Financial Stability in Conventional Commercial Banks: A Systematic Literature Review of Scopus Q1–Q2 Articles (2019–2024). Journal of Innovative and Creativity (Joecy), 6(2), 41791–41799. https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v6i2.12943

Issue

Section

Articles