Transformasi Pembelajaran Interaktif: Inovasi Teknologi dalam Meningkatkan Keterlibatan Siswa di SMAN 2 Bangkinang Kota.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31004/joecy.v5i2.1220Abstract
Interactive learning through technology has become an essential element in enhancing student engagement in the digital era. This study aims to explore the implementation of interactive technology in learning at SMAN 2 Bangkinang Kota, identify its impact on student engagement, and analyze the challenges faced by teachers in adapting to these technologies. Using a qualitative approach with a case study method, this research examines the experiences of 7 teachers who actively utilize smart boards, digital platforms, and multimedia applications in their teaching.
Data collection was conducted through in-depth interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis, while data analysis employed thematic analysis to identify patterns related to student engagement and technological implementation challenges. The findings reveal that interactive technology enhances student engagement in learning, particularly in terms of active participation, conceptual understanding, and independent exploration of materials. Classroom observations indicate that students learning with multimedia simulations and interactive quizzes demonstrated higher engagement levels compared to those using traditional methods. However, the study also found that teacher readiness and infrastructure limitations remain significant obstacles in optimizing technology implementation. Some teachers experience difficulties in adapting to technology, while unstable internet access frequently disrupts the smooth delivery of digital-based learning. Therefore, this research recommends the implementation of continuous training programs for teachers, improved access to technological infrastructure, and strengthened school policies to ensure effective and sustainable technology integration in education. Through a more structured implementation strategy, schools are expected to leverage interactive technology to create a more innovative, participatory, and exploratory learning environment.
References
Abykanova, B., Nugumanova, S., Yelezhanova, S., Kabylkhamit, Z., & Sabirova, Z. (2016). The use of interactive learning technology in institutions of higher learning. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(18), 12528-12539.
Akar, H. (2020). The effect of smart board use on academic achievement: A meta-analytical and thematic study. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 8(3), 261-273.
Alkhaldi, N. (2025). Evolution of education: How interactive technologies reshaped learning. eLearning Industry.
Bećirović, S. (2023). Challenges and barriers for effective integration of technologies into teaching and learning. SpringerBriefs in Education.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. Internet and Higher Education, 19(2), 18-26.
Gregory, D. (2023). Interactive learning with technology: Advantages and real-life applications. i3-Technologies.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking. Merrill/Prentice Hall.
Kvale, S. (2009). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.
Mohebi, L. (2021). Theoretical models of integration of interactive learning technologies into teaching: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(12), 232-254.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Sage Publications.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage Publications
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Indah Efriani Zahara, Novi Ferlinitasari, Jhon Hendro, Erlisnawati Erlisnawati, Gimin Gimin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







